He wrote for the WA Post for 15 years, and a great many of those stories were about stem cells.
I would make the point that stem cells have been the seminal iconic story of science journalism of our time . . .both good and bad. What's that story about? Science and progress, the possibility of cures, a chance to let readers know how research is done, how genes and cells work
At the same time it's an epic moral story about the beginnings of life . . if we can even talk about that--because as a great scientist once told me, in truth life actually began only once, and that was billions of years ago ( I LOVE that)
And of course it's a great political story, a philosophical and religious story.
Then there are the hype stories and the people trying to sell us a bill of goods. A researcher once told me that he knew stem cells could not cure alzheimers but he would say the opposite because people needed a fairy tale.
We have senators standing up talking about embryos being dismembered, when we all know that 5-day-old embryos don't have any members to be dissed . . .
So, how is this going to be play out now? Science journalism is shrinking with the newspapers.
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment